[Development of advanced practice nursing in oncology and hematology-oncology in France: Early status report]. / Développement des infirmiers en pratique avancée en oncologie et hémato-oncologie en France : état des lieux précoce.

BACKGROUND: Advanced practice nursing was introduced in France in 2018, in response to health needs. The first advanced practice nurses were graduated since 2019 and were trained in one among four medical areas including oncology and onco-hematology. The purpose of this article is to make an early assessment of the development of the profession of oncology Advanced Practice Nurse in France. METHOD: An exploratory study was conducted. A sample of 44 onco-hematology IPA graduated in 2019 and 2020 was recruited from June 2021 to end of July 2021. The 44 participants completed a questionnaire, by phone interviews or self-administered. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The distribution of the 44 participants concerns 12 of the 13 regions of metropolitan France. This profession shows an employability for 86% of the first graduates. These professionals practice in health care institutions and rather in oncology, 71% in the framework of an organizational protocol established with the oncologist. They appear to be well accepted by patients and oncology teams. Further studies on performance and quality indicators will make it possible to evaluate the added value of the oncology Advanced Practice Nurses in the cancer patient's pathway.

The Current State of Nursing.

Workforce issues, challenges, and opportunities.

2021: A Year of Hope and Heartbreak.

Optimism that the pandemic would be over was short lived.

Using War Language in a Pandemic: Rhetoric or Responsibility?

Frontline workers deserve protection and follow-up support.

Gerenciamento do tempo no processo de trabalho dos enfermeiros em Unidade de Terapia Intensiva / Gestión del tiempo en el proceso de trabajo de enfermeros de la unidad de cuidados intensivos / Time management in the work process of nurses in the intensive care unit

RESUMO Objetivo analisar o gerenciamento do tempo dispensado por enfermeiros em intervenções de cuidados diretos e indiretos, em atividades associadas ao trabalho e atividades pessoais. Método estudo quantitativo, transversal, realizado em Unidade de Terapia Intensiva de um hospital universitário no Rio de Janeiro em janeiro de 2017. Foram realizadas observações diretas das atividades realizadas pelos enfermeiros em 18 plantões, totalizando 216 horas. O "Instrumento para mensuração da carga de trabalho" foi utilizado para estruturar a observação. Resultados os resultados mostraram que 21,5% do tempo dos enfermeiros foram dedicados às intervenções de cuidados diretos 44,7% aos cuidados indiretos, 6,1% às atividades associadas e 27,7% às atividades pessoais. Conclusão os enfermeiros utilizam maior parte do tempo em atividades não relacionadas ao cuidado direto ao paciente. Os achados podem ser utilizados pelos gestores para revisão e adequação do dimensionamento de profissionais na assistência direta e indireta e do processo de trabalho na Unidade.

RESUMEN Objetivo analizar la gestión del tiempo que brindan los enfermeros en las intervenciones asistenciales directas e indirectas, en actividades asociadas al trabajo y actividades personales. Método estudio cuantitativo, transversal, realizado en la Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos de un hospital universitario de Rio de Janeiro en enero de 2017. Se realizaron observaciones directas de las actividades realizadas por enfermeras en 18 turnos, totalizando 216 horas. Se utilizó la "Herramienta de medición de la carga de trabajo" para estructurar la observación. Resultados los resultados mostraron que el 21,5% del tiempo de los enfermeros se dedicó a intervenciones de cuidados directos, el 44,7% a cuidados indirectos, el 6,1% a actividades asociadas y el 27,7% a actividades personales. Conclusión los enfermeros dedican la mayor parte de su tiempo a actividades no relacionadas con la atención directa al paciente. Los hallazgos pueden ser utilizados por los gestores para revisar y adecuar el dimensionamiento de profesionales en la atención directa e indirecta y el proceso de trabajo en la Unidad.

ABSTRACT Objective to analyze time management by nurses in direct and indirect care interventions, in work-related and personal activities. Method this quantitative, cross-sectional study was conducted in the Intensive Care Unit of a university hospital in Rio de Janeiro in January 2017. Direct observations were made of nurses' activities in 18 shifts, totaling 216 hours. Mello's "Workload Measuring Tool" was used to structure the observations. Results 21.5% of nurses' time was devoted to direct care, 44.7% to indirect care, 6.1% to work-related activities and 27.7% to personal activities. Conclusion nurses spend most of their time on activities unrelated to direct patient care. These findings can be useful to managers in reviewing and adjusting both staffing in direct and indirect care and the unit's work process.

Does continuity in nursing staff matter? A pilot study on correlation of central line-associated bloodstream infections and employee turnover.

BACKGROUND: Understaffing has been previously reported as a risk factor for central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI). No previous study addressed the question whether fluctuations in staffing have an impact on CLABSI incidence. We analyzed prospectively collected CLABSI surveillance data and data on employee turnover of health care workers (HCW) to address this research question. METHODS: In January 2016, a semiautomatic surveillance system for CLABSI was implemented at the University Hospital Zurich, a 940 bed tertiary care hospital in Switzerland. Monthly incidence rates (CLABSI/1000 catheter days) were calculated and correlations with human resources management-derived data on employee turnover of HCWs (defined as number of leaving HCWs per month divided by the number of employed HCWs) investigated. RESULTS: Over a period of 24 months, we detected on the hospital level a positive correlation of CLABSI incidence rates and turnover of nursing personnel (Spearman rank correlation, r = 0.467, P = 0.022). In more detailed analyses on the professional training of nursing personnel, a correlation of CLABSI incidence rates and licensed practical nurses (Spearman rank correlation, r = 0.26, P = 0.038) or registered nurses (r = 0.471, P = 0.021) was found. Physician turnover did not correlate with CLABSI incidence (Spearman rank correlation, r = -0.058, P = 0.787). CONCLUSIONS: Prospectively determined CLABSI incidence correlated positively with the degree of turnover of nurses overall and nurses with advanced training, but not with the turnover of physicians. Efforts to maintain continuity in nursing staff might be helpful for sustained reduction in CLABSI rates.

Working conditions of Nursing professionals in coping with the Covid-19 pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: To trigger a reflection on the current working conditions of Nursing professionals in coping with the Covid-19 pandemic. METHOD: A theoretical-reflective study supported by studies from the Marxist perspective, national and international scientific articles, and official documents from the World Health Organization and the Federal Nursing Council. RESULTS: The daily work of Nursing professionals in the face of the Covid-19 pandemic presents unfavorable working conditions in Brazil and worldwide, with emphasis on the deficit of professionals, overload of activities, low pay, and personal protective equipment, often insufficient and inadequate, conditions that can lead to exhaustion, illness and death. CONCLUSION: This study can contribute to raising discussions about the need for improvements in the working conditions of Nursing professionals, especially in pandemic times and the impact on the health of these professionals.

Admissions of COVID-positive patients to US nursing homes with personal protective equipment or staffing shortages.

BACKGROUND: US nursing homes are required to follow Centers for Disease Control guidance for COVID-19 transmission-based precautions (TBP) when admitting COVID-positive patients. OBJECTIVE: To assess how frequently nursing homes had shortages of personal protective equipment (PPE) or staffing in weeks when they admitted COVID-positive patients, which likely made it more difficult to follow TBP, and to compare facility characteristics by admissions practices. DESIGN AND SETTING: Facility-level data from the Nursing Home COVID-19 Public File for the period between June 7, 2020 and March 7, 2021 was combined with additional data. The percentages of nursing homes that admitted COVID-positive patients and that had shortages when admitting were calculated for each week. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression models were used to examine the relationship between facility characteristics and the likelihood of admitting COVID-positive patients. MEASUREMENTS: Facilities were categorized as having admitted COVID-positive patients in a week if one or more admissions requiring TBP were reported for that week. Facilities that reported having less than a 1-week supply of any type of PPE or being short any type of staff in a week were defined, respectively, as having a PPE shortage or staffing shortage in that week. RESULTS: Over the 40-week study period, 39% of US nursing homes admitted COVID-positive patients in at least 1 week in which they were experiencing PPE or staffing shortages. Facilities that admitted COVID-positive patients with shortages generally had lower Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services overall five-star ratings than other facilities. Only a small percentage of facilities that admitted COVID-positive patients while facing shortages were located in counties with severe shortages of PPE or staffing. In logistic regression models, shortages were not associated with COVID-positive admissions. CONCLUSION: The widespread practice of admitting COVID-positive patients while facing shortages may have put nursing home residents and staff at heightened risk of COVID-19 infection.

Effect of Hurricane Irma on daily direct-care nurse staffing in nursing homes.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the effect of Hurricane Irma on staff-related financial expenditures and daily direct-care nurse staffing levels. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: September 3-24, 2017 in the state of Florida, United States. Hurricane Irma made landfall on September 10, 2017. PARTICIPANTS: Six hundred and fifty-three nursing homes (NHs), 81 evacuated facilities, and 572 facilities that sheltered-in-place. MEASUREMENTS: This study used data from Payroll-Based Journaling (PBJ), Certification and Survey Provider Enhanced Reports (CASPER), and Florida's health providers' emergency reporting system. PBJ provided estimates of daily direct-care nurse staffing levels for registered nurses, licensed practical nurses, and certified nursing assistants. CASPER reported facility-level characteristics such as profit status, chain membership, and special care unit availability. Florida's emergency reporting system identified evacuation status during Hurricane Irma. Linear mixed-effects models were used to estimate the unique contribution of evacuation status on daily staffing increases over time from September 3 to 10. RESULTS: Among all facilities, we found significant increases in staffing for licensed practical nurses (p = 0.02) and certified nursing assistants (p < 0.001), but not for registered nurses (p = 0.10) before Hurricane Irma made landfall. From 1 week before landfall to 2 weeks after landfall (September 3-24), an additional estimated $2.41 million was spent on direct-care nurse staffing. In comparison to facilities that sheltered-in-place, evacuated facilities increased staffing levels of all nurse types (all p < 0.001). At landfall, evacuated facilities spent an estimated $93.74 on nurse staffing per resident whereas facilities that sheltered-in-place spent $76.10 on nurse staffing per resident. CONCLUSION: NHs face unprecedented challenges during hurricanes, including maintaining adequate direct-care nurse staffing levels to meet the needs of their residents. NHs that evacuated residents had an increase in direct-care nurse staffing that was greater than that seen in NHs that sheltered-in-place.

Nursing's Staffing Mandate: Build a More Flexible Workforce.

The COVID-19 pandemic exhausted the nursing workforce, casting doubt that future supply will meet demand. To preserve their workforces, nursing leaders are offering emotional support to the frontline. Although these efforts are essential, leaders are overlooking an untapped opportunity to safeguard staffing levels: creating a more flexible nursing workforce. In this article, the authors discuss flexible nurse staffing and suggest 4 key opportunities for improvement.

Where Do We Go from Here?

What's next for nursing after the pandemic.

A Call to the CMS: Mandate Adequate Professional Nurse Staffing in Nursing Homes.

Editor's note: This article is by 22 nursing gerontology experts who are all advocates of nursing home reform. They are listed at the end of this article.

Nurse and health professional migration during COVID-19.

The COVID-19 pandemic has exposed the vulnerabilities of nursing supply flows, domestically and internationally. Its impact at the country-level has further highlighted preexisting nurse supply gaps and the effect of staffing shortages. Internationally, the pandemic has disrupted global supply chains. The world has witnessed the closing of borders, the interruption of travel, and, in some countries, the restriction of outflows. The State of the World's Nursing Report (SOWN) (WHO, 2020) noted a shortfall of almost six million nurses immediately pre-COVID-19, a shortage suffered particularly by low- and middle-income countries. This is of major concern given that increased international outflows of nurses in the new post-COVID era could undermine, even more than before, the readiness of those countries to meet healthcare demands (ICN, 2020). In this default scenario, some, but not all, highincome destination countries will continue to rely on international inflow of nurses to a significant extent, as they did pre-COVID- 19, further exacerbating the suffering of poor countries. Put simply, without country-level policy changes related to the nursing workforce and backed by international organisations, pre-COVID-19 trends of increased nurse flows from low- to high-income countries will likely continue. In this scenario, the iniquitous maldistribution of nurses may become more pronounced. This "do nothing" option risks undermining both country-level progress towards the attainment of Universal Health.

Nursing and mental health: a reflection in the midst of the coronavirus pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: To reflect on the mental health of Nursing professionals in the context of the coronavirus pandemic. METHOD: This is a theoretical-reflective study based on the discursive formulation on the theme and supported by the national and international scientific literature and by the authors' critical analysis. RESULTS: The analyzed studies, along with the care practice, showed that Nursing professionals are susceptible to the exacerbation of symptoms such as depression, anxiety, insomnia, anguish, and stress in the midst of the coronavirus pandemic, in view of their exhaustive work shifts, patients' deaths, risk of infecting themselves and their families, and social isolation. FINAL CONSIDERATIONS: The mental health of Nursing professionals needs to be listed as one of the priorities for health managers, guaranteeing strategies and public policies that ensure sanity for those who are in the front line of the fight against the pandemic.

Shortages of Staff in Nursing Homes During the COVID-19 Pandemic: What are the Driving Factors?

OBJECTIVES: During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, US nursing homes (NHs) have been under pressure to maintain staff levels with limited access to personal protection equipment (PPE). This study examines the prevalence and factors associated with shortages of NH staff during the COVID-19 pandemic. DESIGN: We obtained self-reported information on staff shortages, resident and staff exposure to COVID-19, and PPE availability from a survey conducted by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services in May 2020. Multivariate logistic regressions of staff shortages with state fixed-effects were conducted to examine the effect of COVID-19 factors in NHs. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: 11,920 free-standing NHs. MEASURES: The dependent variables were self-reported shortages of licensed nurse staff, nurse aides, clinical staff, and other ancillary staff. We controlled for NH characteristics from the most recent Nursing Home Compare and Certification and Survey Provider Enhanced Reporting, market characteristics from Area Health Resources File, and state Medicaid reimbursement calculated from Truven data. RESULTS: Of the 11,920 NHs, 15.9%, 18.4%, 2.5%, and 9.8% reported shortages of licensed nurse staff, nurse aides, clinical staff, and other staff, respectively. Georgia and Minnesota reported the highest rates of shortages in licensed nurse and nurse aides (both >25%). Multivariate regressions suggest that shortages in licensed nurses and nurse aides were more likely in NHs having any resident with COVID-19 (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.44, 1.60, respectively) and any staff with COVID-19 (AOR = 1.37, 1.34, respectively). Having 1-week supply of PPE was associated with lower probability of staff shortages. NHs with a higher proportion of Medicare residents were less likely to experience shortages. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: Abundant staff shortages were reported by NHs and were mainly driven by COVID-19 factors. In the absence of appropriate staff, NHs may be unable to fulfill the requirement of infection control even under the risk of increased monetary penalties.